
Is the CPQ Space Lacking Innovation?
Shaowei Mao, Co-founder and CEO of Veloce, writes about the innovation in the development of Veloce CPQ.
Shaowei Mao, Co-founder and CEO of Veloce, writes about the innovation in the development of Veloce CPQ.
The R word. The signs are all around us it seems — from large layoffs at tech companies to slowdowns in manufacturing and a potential new round of supply-chain disruptions brought on by pandemics. What is the best course of action when fighting economic headwinds?
If the CPQ fits, wear it! But much of the time — let’s be honest — the CPQ doesn’t fit. Here’s an insider look at how to successfully choose a CPQ partner, from a seasoned executive who has seen it all when it comes to companies looking for the right fit (okay, maybe I haven’t seen it ALL, but pretty close!)
Not only have you NOT seen an ROI since you deployed your new CPQ application—assuming you were actually able to deploy, the CPQ has not brought the desired results to your sales and quoting process.
When evaluating CPQ solutions, you may hear about constraint-based vs. rule-based configuration engines. This post will help make sense of the pros and cons of both. Veloce CPQ is exceptional in that it makes use of both constraint-based versus rule-based technologies. Read on to see why this is a benefit.
What’s the secret sauce in Veloce CPQ and why is it a great option for today’s high tech enterprises and manufacturing companies that have struggled with their CPQ projects? Listen in to Luigi Aditiarama, Veloce’s VP of Product at Veloce, as he talks with Novus CPQ Consulting’s Frank Sohn.